Network Security Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Network Security - Assignment Example The following is a discussion of responses of two stakeholders to the case. Other presidential candidates should dispute the election of president X because of the involved fraud and Article 2, section one of the 12th amendment support their claim. According to the article, electors in each state shall determine the president and his vice, and communicate their voting results. This means establishment of a valid electors at the state level. Electors are however elected by majority vote and this relies on validity of the general elections. Knowledge of a presidential contestant regarding election fraud at the public suffrage level is therefore not significant to the issue because the main concern is validity of electors from East Dakota. Evidence however points to electoral malpractices that could have altered composition of the electors and this significance means that the validity concerns applies to the election of the president. In addition, electors’ votes from East Dakota were fundamental to the election and this means that invalid votes elected the president. Consequently, the other presidential candidates were denied their rights to free and fair elections that they are entitled to and they should seek judicial enforcement of the right through contesting validity of the elections. They should therefore demand for a rerun of the election because the constitution requires simultaneous voting by electors throughout the nation (United States Senate 1). Like the other presidential candidates, East Dakota citizens are likely to respond by disputing the presidential elections. Their interest in other candidates, significance of the electoral votes from the state to the presidential elections, and significance of the fraud in the state’s elections are some of the reasons for the potential response. Significance of the state in determining outcome of the presidential elections means that