Censorship Essay - Dont Censor Child Pornography -- Argumentative Per

Dont Censor Child Pornography In November of 1997 a Williamson County, Tenn. marvelous jury indicted Barnes & courtly booksellers for violating state obscenity laws prohibiting the display of material noisome to minors. The materials in question were two books that featured photographs of nude children sponsor Sturges Radiant Identities and David Hamiltons The Age of Innocence. Since then, Radical Right activist Randall Terry has launched a crusade aimed at forcing bookstores to remove the criminal garbage of Sturges, Hamilton and (recently added to his list of demons) wisecrack Mann from their bookshelves (bookweb). To implement his program Terry issued a call to Right sympathizers, spur them to march into bookstores and tear offensive pages from the targeted books. Several bookstores around the country degenerate prey to Terrys vandals. In response to these incidents and the threat of future public vandalism, Barnes & Noble recently issued a memo to each of its 1000+ stor es directing them to berth the contested materials under lock and key, and to allow customers to fit them only in the presence of a store manager (apocalypse 9709). This response is upsetting. It is upsetting because it essence that, in several significant ways, Terry has won. True, no one (as of yet) has adorn Sturges or the others in jail (as Terry has called for), but the publics right to view the supposed pornographic content of their cash in ones chips has been significantly diminished by Barnes & Nobles action. By acknowledging the threat of Terry and his small group of supporters, B&N has reified their claim that the work of the named photographers needs to be segregated from the decent publics reach. It installs a technology of surveillance that in... ...ms to me that it would be rather unlikely for a late child to stumble onto the work of a contemporary professional photographer. S/he would drop to know something about that photographer, know what his or her work i s about, and know how to get to it. This means that, in the case of these photographers, the child would have to know something about nudity, art and photography to want to seek them out. If s/he already knows something about these subjects, then what harm is viewing nude bodies going to have? Works Cited Foucault, Michel, History of Sexuality, Vol I An Introduction, New York Pantheon, 1978. www.bookweb.org/ intelligence activity/btw/905.html http//apocalypse.berkshire.net/ifas/fw/9709/terry.html http//apocalypse.berkshire.net/ifas/fw/9509/terry.html www.villagevoice.com/pride/10goldstein.shtml